← All graduates
Founding cohort · Mar–May 2026

Derick Ampadu

AI Governance Lead on a high-risk credit AI review

Led a governance review of a high-risk credit AI system across the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001, and defended a Conditional Go decision with evidence.

Conditional Go
Certified May 28, 2026 · 20 CPE
Ask us
Request an introductionView portfolioVerify certificateLinkedIn
The capstone and the decision, defended in their own words.
Derick Ampadu presenting his production readiness review

The capstone

The question: should Meridian Financial Services approve production deployment of a loan underwriting system that decides 94% of applications automatically?

The system: a third-party credit model (CrediSure Credit Decision Engine v2.3) that auto-approves, auto-denies or routes small-business loan applications to manual review. Derick classified it as a high-risk AI use case because it affects access to credit.

Derick's role: AI Governance Lead.

The decision Derick defended: Conditional Go. In Derick's words: “Proceed with conditions. Meridian should not approve unrestricted production deployment until fairness testing, proxy-bias review, reason code validation, human oversight triggers, appeal procedures, vendor evidence review, monitoring thresholds, and governance committee approval are completed.”

What Derick produced

  • AI system profile and intake record
  • AI risk register and mitigation summary
  • Human oversight and appeal procedure
  • Third-party vendor and model review
  • Production-readiness decision memo
  • Consolidated portfolio report from VerifyWise

Skills demonstrated

  • Leading an AI governance review of a high-risk use case, from intake to decision
  • Documenting an AI system profile and governance intake record
  • Assessing fairness, explainability, automation, vendor and human-oversight risk
  • Applying the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 in practice
  • Reviewing a third-party AI model and its vendor
  • Designing human oversight, exception review and appeal procedures
  • Writing an executive-ready production-readiness recommendation
  • Organizing evidence, risks, policies and framework assessments in a governance platform

How each framework was applied

EU AI Act: high-risk classification, fundamental rights impact assessment, human oversight, logging, explanation to affected people, appeal and contestability, deployment conditions.

NIST AI RMF: governance roles, system context, risk measurement and testing evidence, risk treatment, human-AI oversight.

ISO/IEC 42001: management system scope, roles, AI risk assessment and treatment, management review, lifecycle and third-party AI risk.

Tool: VerifyWise (governance dashboard, use case registration, model inventory, dataset record, risk register, vendor record, framework assessments, FRIA).

Verified credential

Certificate of Completion: Becoming an AI Governance, Risk & Compliance Practitioner, an 8-week practitioner program. Issued May 28, 2026 · 20 CPE.

The capstone is a simulated enterprise case built for training, not a review of a real company's system.

At a glance
Program
AI Governance, Risk & Compliance Practitioner (8 weeks)
Cohort
Founding cohort · Mar–May 2026
Decision defended
Conditional Go
Frameworks applied
EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001
Tools
VerifyWise
Target roles
Location
Availability
Ask us
ResumeCover letter
Request an introduction

Introductions are free. We check with the graduate first, then connect you both by email.

© 2026 CyberProsAI. All rights reserved.Privacy policy